If you order your custom term paper from our custom writing service you will receive a perfectly written assignment on Election. What we need from you is to provide us with your detailed paper instructions for our experienced writers to follow all of your specific writing requirements. Specify your order details, state the exact number of pages required and our custom writing professionals will deliver the best quality Election paper right on time.
Our staff of freelance writers includes over 120 experts proficient in Election, therefore you can rest assured that your assignment will be handled by only top rated specialists. Order your Election paper at affordable prices
Ideally, the American political system is divided into two basic schools of thought. Basically, there are two ways to look at life. One could take the conservative route, which generally favors little government, so called traditional family values, business interests and the interests of the upper class, or the other angle one could take would be the more liberal minded progressive point of view which deals a lot more with labor rights, artistic freedom, anti-censorship, and diversity. In todays American democracy, the shift has been much more to a conservative view of politics, often times turning supposedly liberal Democrats to become moderate Republicans, as is the case of Bill Clinton. Consequently, politicians have played multiple political games to win the vote by posing as middle of the road candidates and upon election reveal their true face and interests. Despite the fact that the Democrats and the Republicans have nearly identical financial backers, there is a slight difference in each of their public policy agendas, (public policy of course being defined as what government says and not what government does). The liberals often side with the Democrats, where as the conservatives side with the Republicans. Thus, the modern political structure that is in effect in our country makes debate seem to be representing two contrasting views.
A topic that is not being mentioned enough in the 000 election is that of the environment. Each candidate has said their statement on what they think should be done about such things such as global warming, greenhouse gases, endangered species, the Kyoto protocol, clean air, and others. The Republicans have said their opinion of what we should do with the environment. George W. Bushs idea is to continue to explore for more oil and gas and to reduce foreign dependence. This may have a lot to do with the large amount of oil shares that he and his family enjoy. McCain calls for similar programs, but his emphasis naturally lies more in what Congress has said and what is Congress is saying. Interestingly enough, both McCain and Bush oppose the Kyoto treaty. The Kyoto treaty would require the U.S. to cut down on its CO emissions. Bush and McCain, as well as many other conservatives, claim that this would be too costly for the U.S.. They also claim that this would in effect be a barrier to free trade because it would cause an unnecessary financial strain on corporations. McCain said in an interview recently, If climate change is a bona-fide global environmental problem, the solution must be global as well. I have serious concerns about the Kyoto treaty because it fails to include the participation of countries such as India and China. A problem that is serious enough to require U.S. action, should require the participation of other major countries as well.. The contradiction, Senator, is obvious and elementary. The U.S. uses more resources than nearly all of the countries of the world combined, yet it only constitutes as about one eighth of the population of China and India. Also, India and China are both considered to be developing nations in the eyes of the U.S., meaning that the U.S. does not recognize them as an industrial power and hence, in the market driven U.S. foreign policy, they are not a major nation. The Democrats claimed a lot of the same things as the Republicans, claiming that upon election they will work with the people to clean up the environment. Al Gore has stressed the importance of protecting the environment in a way that is market based and realistic, and does not lead to economic cooling.. Of course he fails to mention things like the WTO or any of the other organizations made up of cut-throat multinational corporations who are responsible for the exploitation of the environment and the people at a larger scale then the government is capable of. Perhaps upon election he will take a stance polar to Clintons and stand against Privatized global tyrannies. Bradley on the other hand recognizes that our trade institutions and agreements need to incorporate better ways to protect and advance environmental standards.. But little, if any, plan is offered.
Education is another topic of interest in the campaigns of the four presidential hopefuls. Bush is calling for a moral education system. What exactly that encompass, or how it would be carried out, he doesnt outline. He also doesnt mention, although it is obvious, whos morals he was wanting to teach. Its funny how much of the same people who claim family values are the same people who support big business, racism, homophobia, the Religious Right (which does nothing by way of doing what Jesus wanted) and selling weapons to dictators all over the world (something that Poppa Bush so arrogantly endorsed). He calls for increasing penalties on children who bring guns to school in response to the recent massacres that have been plaguing middle class white suburbanites for the past few years. He promises that the federal government will offer grants to schools that show improvement in all areas, including violence, drugs, and overall student performance. In those schools where improvement is less than desirable, the student will have the option to transfer. McCain has his own plan set out for bettering the education programs in our country. One of his big points is school vouchers, which inadvertently re-institutes segregation by allowing better off white kids to choose another school that is more upper class because they will have the option and money to do so. Meanwhile, the less fortunate people of color (who cant afford to make such moves) are stuck where they are and because they arent showing improvement they will not receive as much federal aid (punish the children because their school is incompetent!). McCain also calls for encouraging proficiency in English and other languages to increase our competitiveness in the global marketplace. Once again, the emphasis is put on business interests and little is mentioned to increase the spending into the arts, philosophy, or the other liberal sciences. Al Gore is the only main presidential hopeful who even mentioned special education. Gore is proposing the largest increase in special education that has ever been proposed. He also favors school choice and charter schools.
An issue that is probably the most popular among the candidates is the same issue that started the Boston Tea Party and that is the issue of taxes. Needless to say, people are very picky about where their money goes. At times, people are more interested in tax breaks than they are what program is going to get cut because of loss of revenue. McCain favors a real tax relief for American families and creating a fair tax system that only taxes one time. This of course requires lowering taxes and consequently cutting a lot of the programs that previously went to helping the poorer people who he claims he is helping by cutting taxes! In a time when corporations prices are booming (in fact leaving economist the dilemma of having to find more synonyms for dazzling) Bush plans on fighting any tax increase that may be put on corporate income. This shows that his true interests are in the private sector rather than the public sector. Not only are we defying economic history by our economy doing so well, but economist predict that no real change should occur in our economy in at least ten years. The money that could be collected from an increase in the corporate income tax could fund nearly all the programs that face our nation and are currently being debated. Bradley is working to simplify the tax code, ensuring fairness to middle class tax payers. Once again he is promising blind tax cuts without saying what programs would need to be cut. Gore offers many of the same solutions when it comes to taxes, again appealing to peoples accumulated selfishness to create a kind of symbolic policy in order to win the vote.
Election 000
Election 000 overview Presidential election cycles are always three-ring circuses, and the 000 election has become one of the biggest circuses ever. With a two-term president unable to seek re-election, the House of Representatives clearly up for grabs, and Democrats counting on major Senate gains -- even hoping to win control -- there is a lot at stake in this years elections. Republicans optimism is based on their view that they will take back the White House after an eight-year hiatus. GOP insiders believe that Americans are tired of Bill Clinton, have doubts about Vice President Al Gore and are ready for change. Republican turnout was down in 18, which helps account for the partys poor showing in the off-year elections. And even the most loyal Republican will agree that the partys recent presidential nominees, Bob Dole and former President George Herbert Walker Bush (in 1), failed to excite Republicans and Independents. GOP strategists think that strength at the top of the ticket in 000 will help all Republican candidates. Democrats have reasons to worry about the presidential race. While Republicans held the White House for three consecutive terms from 180 to 1, voters often grow tired of one party after two terms. Ethics questions and controversies involving Clinton and Gore have also given Republicans ammunition. And recent history isnt with the Democrats. Only four sitting vice presidents -- John Adams, Thomas Jefferson, Martin Van Buren and George Bush -- were elected directly to the presidency in the entire history of the nation. Al Gore is hoping to make it five. The GOP presidential nominee, Texas Gov. George W. Bush, recovered after a shaky start during the primary season and tried to establish education as his most important issue. Surveys throughout the summer showed him with an early lead, which grew dramatically just before the GOPs national convention. Those same polls showed voters gave him high marks on his ability to handle key issues, including traditional Democratic ones such as health care, education and Social Security. Even more important, those same polls showed him with a significant advantage over the vice president in the area of leadership. But Gore changed all that with his performance on the last day of the Democrats Los Angeles national convention. Whether it was the highly publicized kiss he gave his wife, Tipper, or his fiery, populist speech, Gore changed the publics view of him. No longer was he a political opportunist or stiff second banana. Instead, he was a passionate, loving father and husband who lacked many of Clintons weaknesses. Public sentiment turned on a dime. Instead of being down double-digits in the polls, as he was going into the Democratic convention, Gore jumped a few points ahead of Bush. Gores luck didnt change when he left California. He and his running mate, Connecticut Sen. Joe Lieberman, began a whirlwind campaign swing, with Lieberman -- the highly regarded Orthodox Jew and critic of the presidents personal behavior -- vouching for Gores integrity, morality and sincerity. Gores selection of Lieberman was regarded as a bold move. While some liberals and African Americans in the Democratic Party complained about the senators moderate stands, Lieberman reiterated his support for the Gore agenda and helped the Vice President re-introduce himself to the country. At the same time, Bushs running mate, former Defense Secretary Dick Cheney, was fanning the fuels of controversy by delaying a decision about what he would do with certain Halliburton stock options, and Bush was floundering when asked about his tax cut plan and about his charge that the U.S. military was not fully ready. While Gore looked relaxed and energetic, Bush made mistakes, including miscalculating how the debate over debates would play, a much publicized gaffe in front of an open microphone, and his mispronunciation of the word subliminal. Post-Labor Day polls suggested that Gore surged ahead of Bush by at least a few points. Republicans became much less optimistic about Bush than they were in July, while Democrats, who started to wonder about Gores electability, turned increasingly hopeful. But the race turned again before the end of September, when Bush went on two popular daytime television shows and Gore was hit by the media and his GOP opponents for exaggerating and embellishing stories and anecdotes. Suddenly, Gore was again on the defensive over the issue of character. The polls turned toward Bush, who received a surprising boost from the first presidential debate and then for Dick Cheneys performance in the lone debate between the vice presidential candidates. Bush did even better in the second presidential debate, and while most political insiders thought Gore did better in the third debate, television viewers split between Bush and Gore when asked to pick the winner. So, as Election Day nears, the roller-coaster presidential race looked much as it once did -- headed for a close contest and an uncertain outcome. While its unclear whether the Democrats can hang onto the White House, its likely that the Republicans will lose seats in both the House and Senate. Normally, a strong economy means a content electorate that returns congressional incumbents to office and maintains the political status quo. But this year is different. While few House incumbents are likely to lose, the narrowness of the GOPs House majority means the Democrats could pick up just a handful of seats and still win control of that body. The Reform and Green Parties still remain a question mark. While the Reform Party was split early on between its Pat Buchanan and John Hagelin wings, Buchanan was finally awarded the $1.6 million in federal funds that the party was due. But Buchanan, who was thought to be a headache for Bush, has proved to be a non-factor. Hagelin is the Natural Law Partys nominee, though he is also on some state ballots as the Reform nominee. Meanwhile, Ralph Nader, the Green Party nominee, has become a factor in the presidential contest. While he clearly lost some support after the Democratic convention, he seemed to gain steam during October, increasing his vote in key states, such as Oregon and Washington. The presidential race appears to heading toward a showdown in about a dozen states, with the outcome in Florida, Michigan, Pennsylvania, Ohio, Wisconsin and the Northwest most important. Its very clear that there is a lot at stake in the 000 elections. But the voters dont seem passionate about one party or the other. That means that all the races -- from president down to the House -- will focus on individual candidates and their campaigns.
Word Count 104
Please note that this sample paper on Election is for your review only. In order to eliminate any of the plagiarism issues, it is highly recommended that you do not use it for you own writing purposes. In case you experience difficulties with writing a well structured and accurately composed paper on Election, we are here to assist you. Your cheap custom college paper on Election will be written from scratch, so you do not have to worry about its originality.
Order your authentic assignment and you will be amazed at how easy it is to complete a quality custom paper within the shortest time possible!
