If you order your cheap essays from our custom writing service you will receive a perfectly written assignment on What is Prairie Literature?. What we need from you is to provide us with your detailed paper instructions for our experienced writers to follow all of your specific writing requirements. Specify your order details, state the exact number of pages required and our custom writing professionals will deliver the best quality What is Prairie Literature? paper right on time.
Our staff of freelance writers includes over 120 experts proficient in What is Prairie Literature?, therefore you can rest assured that your assignment will be handled by only top rated specialists. Order your What is Prairie Literature? paper at affordable prices!
In order to successfully write prairie literature, one must incorporate landscape into their story. David Arnason's "The Ogress" and Vanderhaeghe's "Fraud" are quite similar in their use of landscape but differ slightly on some regards. To bring landscape into their stories, they used three main ideas. They had their antagonists struggle to create a sense of identity and become rooted in a home, through the use of prairie based imagery, and through the conquest of territory along with the hardships of prairie life today.
In agreement with Mandel, I state, the reason the prairies have such trouble creating an identity and getting rooted into a home is because everyone who lives here, had a forefather that migrated here only a handful of generations ago. Everyone who migrated here also brought their own culture and identity with them because they came from quite a few different countries. This difference in culture and beliefs really makes it difficult for the prairies to establish their own identity. "Mentally, I was being brought up a genteel Victorian boy, … Physically, emotionally, like Stegner's words, I was a sensuous little savage. The contradictions didn't strike me then; only later, in the attempt to locate a self, a place." (46 Mandel) Prairie writers have to base their culture and tradition around Europe because the prairies have not established a tradition of their own. So, culturally, prairie landscape can be brought into a story through this idea, having the antagonist struggle to create an identity and home. This idea is portrayed in both the works of Arnason and Vanderhaeghe. In both stories, the antagonist is struggling to create a sense of identity. Both of their lives are basically just lies. In each case, the alternate ego is manipulative and cruel. They both are losing or have lost control of their lives. "Because you had no restraint. You would have depopulated the whole town." (5 Arnason) "and still, he can't shake the queer feeling that he's had ever since he laid eyes on her - that he's losing control of his own life." (160 Vanderhaeghe). These two people sound like they have an identical problem; they can't control themselves. This similarity can be further developed by showing that both antagonists are having a tough time settling down and becoming rooted in a home. In "Fraud", Reg definitely is in need of a home to help him settle down. He is constantly complaining about his nerves and about his stomach problems. "Tomorrow he'd have her buy a water bed for him; he'd always wanted one but his previous life had made one impractical." (166 Vanderhaeghe) In the end, Reg finds himself a home and tries to settle in. "The Ogress" is a much similar pattern. She never feels as though she fits in, in her house, in fact she quite often tells us she must have been adopted. This lack of comfort and feeling of fitting in, is the comparison between "The Ogress" and "Fraud". Each story helps us realize what the prairies are all about. The prairies are relatively new on the time line. They have just begun to establish an identity, and that's why its residences are just beginning to get comfortable themselves. Both antagonists find a little closure in the end of their short stories. Along with sense of identity, you could also look at the conquest of territory and hardships as a valid source of landscape.
"The conquest of territory is by definition a violent process. In the Canadian West as elsewhere on this continent, it involved the displacement of the indigenous population by other scandalous means, and then the taming of the land itself." (11 Kreisel) So why shouldn't that come across in prairie writing today? In fact it does in both short stories.Arnason's antagonist is the epitome of what is stated above. She conquers her territory, quite violently, displacing her people by scandalous means. It is true that the reality is different. She isn't displacing people for land or wealth, like the English did with the Native Americans, she's merely trying to better her own circumstances. But these are the prairie's today. Hardships have definitely changed. Scandalous politics and bullying jocks seem to be some of the hardships associated in "The Ogress", but just as in the 1700's it still isn't right. Killing Native Americans and stealing their land wasn't right then, just as eating someone because you dislike them is wrong now. Vanderhaeghe's antagonist also displaces the population by a scandalous mean but in his case, he does do it for wealth. Stealing is his job. The economic hardships in "Fraud" are placed on economic worries and environmental change. In this day and age, the man makes a living by cheating and lying and stealing from relatively weak and defenceless people. All of which the English did to take the land in the first place. Vanderhaeghe uses the imagery "dog-eat-dog world" (15 Vanderhaeghe). Giving us a sense of the instability of the prairies even today. Some two hundred plus years after the battle for the land. Arnason and Vanderhaeghe both used the history of prairie establishment as a way to bring landscape into their stories. Arnason's antagonist being much more vicious, but Vanderhaeghe's much more scandalous. Both of which prairie history is full of. Conquest of territory and hardships can be a powerful landscape tool but you can also use imagery to get your point across.Cheap University Papers on What is Prairie Literature?
Another way to bring landscape into a story is through geographic landscape. Imagery allows the reader to feel and see the prairies in their mind. It relates things that may not seem very farmer-like to the prairies. This helps us understand the mentality of a farmer. I can see how a farmer may relate the same thing. Imagery allows us to understand and relate to something by bringing it down to a simple concept and by bringing it close to home. Kreisel believes the same thing. The prairies are one of a kind, unlike any other part of the world. Few houses, flat lands, and clear acreage allowing you to see for miles. This is just one of the reasons imagery can be so powerful on the prairies. The prairies are really quite unique. It can give a real good idea of what it is like to live here. Arnasons use of imagery is not prairie oriented. He gives us pictures of flavours of ice cream, computers, and golf courses. In fact the whole short story is basically based around a golf course and golf was invented in Europe. That shows his mentality is still somewhat European. Arnason and Vanderhaeghe's short stories are conflicting in this regard. Vanderhaeghe uses some wonderful imagery helping me to get a real good prairie feel. Vanderhaeghes use of prairie imagery allows him to locate the story anywhere geographically that he wants. This holds true because prairie literature is a state of mind, not place. Some of Vanderhaeghe's best imagery are "bird-like nips at her whisky", "One bad apple can spoil the barrel", "corral that loon" and "Cora crooned'Moon River' the whole time."(157-16 Vanderhaeghe) This kind of imagery allows the reader to be the man in the prairies, to see what he sees and feel what he feels. It really shows Vanderhaeghes love for the prairies and that his heart and mind will always reside here, no matter where he may be. That is something that Arnason is missing in his literature; a real passion. He knows how to write prairie literature but he doesn't know how to feel prairie literature. His mind may be in the prairies but his heart, it seems is not. You can take his words and feelings and place them anywhere in the world, and he still fits in. He also seems very historical. He wants to relate everything back to where it originated. To really give a story a prairie feel, you need to have experienced prairie life, and it has to be buried in your heart. You have to relate everything to one thing; the prairies..
Arnason and Vanderhaeghe both did wonderful jobs of making landscape a part of their short stories. They each had their antagonists struggle to create a sense of self and belonging. They each had their antagonists conquest territory and scandalously displace the population in some way. The only real difference came in imagery. Arnason's lack of imagery didn't allow me to really connect with his story, unlike that of Vanderhaeghes, which I connected with quite easily..
Please note that this sample paper on What is Prairie Literature? is for your review only. In order to eliminate any of the plagiarism issues, it is highly recommended that you do not use it for you own writing purposes. In case you experience difficulties with writing a well structured and accurately composed paper on What is Prairie Literature?, we are here to assist you. Your cheap custom research papers on What is Prairie Literature? will be written from scratch, so you do not have to worry about its originality.
Order your authentic assignment and you will be amazed at how easy it is to complete a quality custom paper within the shortest time possible!
