If you order your cheap custom essays from our custom writing service you will receive a perfectly written assignment on Kennedy V. Parrot Brief. What we need from you is to provide us with your detailed paper instructions for our experienced writers to follow all of your specific writing requirements. Specify your order details, state the exact number of pages required and our custom writing professionals will deliver the best quality Kennedy V. Parrot Brief paper right on time.
Our staff of freelance writers includes over 120 experts proficient in Kennedy V. Parrot Brief, therefore you can rest assured that your assignment will be handled by only top rated specialists. Order your Kennedy V. Parrot Brief paper at affordable prices!
KENNEDY V. PARROT (N.C. App. 156.PARTIES & ROLES Kennedy, a patient, is suing Parrot, a doctor, for battery.FACTS P patient consulted D doctor and subsequently had surgery for apendiscitis. During the surgery D doctor discovered and removed cycsts from P patient's ovaries. A blood vessel was cut during the procedure and P patient developed phlebitis. Serious, injury; additional surjury; extreme pain.HIST T/Ct. verd. For the D doctor.
Cheap College Papers on Kennedy V. Parrot Brief
ISSUE #1 Did the T/Ct. error in determining that D was not at fault for the plaintiff's phlebitis.DISP.#1 No. Verd. for D doctor.RULE #1 When a doctor acts with due care for their patients they are not guilty of negligently causing a patient injury.REASONS#.·Expert medical testimony demonstrated that due care was taken [medical science.ISSUE# Did the T/Ct. error in determining that D doctor did not commit a trespass/battery upon P patient since she did not consent to having the cycsts ruptured.DISP.# No. Verd. for D doctor.RULE# If a surgeon in the course of a procedure acts without the express consent of a patient in order to preserve their life or health and it is impracticable to obtain his consent or the consent of someone authorized to speak for him he has not commited a battery/trespass.REASONS #.·Anesthesia makes it impossible to obtain consent for necessary additional procedures after surgery has also began. [medical science.·It is common practice for doctors to be given increased authority over surgical procedures when patients are under anesthesia [medicine.·It is not possible to know the extent of a patients internal element until incisions are made. [medicine.·Unexpected occurrences arise during and incidental to surgery and good medical practice dictates a surgeon should use his knowledge and skill to the best of his ability to remedy it. [medicine.·If the surgeon had merely performed the appendectomy the cysts would have likely been punctured anyway. [medicine.·The puncturing of the cysts is accepted surgical practice for the procedure being performed. [medicine.·As surgical practices have evolved it has become necessary for the common law to evolve as well and allow surgeons more leeway. [legal theory.·The danger of not puncturing the cysts would be evident to any surgeon. [medicine/common sense]..
Please note that this sample paper on Kennedy V. Parrot Brief is for your review only. In order to eliminate any of the plagiarism issues, it is highly recommended that you do not use it for you own writing purposes. In case you experience difficulties with writing a well structured and accurately composed paper on Kennedy V. Parrot Brief, we are here to assist you. Your on Kennedy V. Parrot Brief will be written from scratch, so you do not have to worry about its originality.
Order your authentic assignment and you will be amazed at how easy it is to complete a quality custom paper within the shortest time possible!
